Is being introverted and contemplative a trait that works to your advantage in mass psychosis. Look at some facts: a virus with no natural mutating background, a complex "vaccine" must be made in a few months. A Spike protein, a misfolding protein, a prion what causes Creutzfeldt-Jakob is in a "vaccine."
The "gain of function" policy was not allowed to be implemented in the USA during Obama. American scientists left for China and Ukraine. Global measures that have no scientific basis. Come on! ?
Having witnessed the clarity of Malone, Desmet, and their critics, the Breggin attacks reminded me of the attacks against Peter Duesberg, Andrew Wakefield, and Celia Farber.
... the usual suspects contrived "56 errors" to attack Farber, Harpers, and anyone else who dared to legitimize her heretical two-year, heavily fact-checked report.
The attack signatories were all Fauci HIV grantees.
Their absurd attack and names were enough for effortless skepticism, which was enough for the propagandists.
So when I read the Breggin report, I recognized the style. No serious person would go out of their way to write what they claim to have written.
I've grilled plenty of docs under oath and was not impressed with more than a few - especially "virologists" who rely on divining rods like flow cytometry and PCR testing (PCR is real, PCR tests are not) instead of Koch's Postulates or electron microscopy.
I'm skeptical of them ALL, but Dr. Malone and his peers have broken their silence and raised legitimate questions that must be heard as part of their moral obligation to "informed consent". Their modest exposure of that ongoing, trillion-dollar-pseudoscientific-theocratic money-laundering operation (that they all played a part of) understandably challenges the lives, careers, and credibility of thousands of bent pseudo-scientists and universities - the churches, temples, clerics, theologians, apostles, disciples, and mullahs who, if faced with their day of reckoning in this world would not be reputable enough to drive cabs or dig ditches (without watchful direct supervision).
So yeah, Breggin's attacks serve its purpose because the majority of the global population is too afflicted by life and characteristics described by Asch, Milgram, Desmet and others - people who are too addled, stressed, and distracted to study the arguments from one side or another. In that cacophony, the noisiest mob wins. Like Duesberg, Wakefield and Farber, casual observers will hear that Malone and Desmet were "discredited", shrug their shoulders and think to themselves, "well, who really knows?"
Is being introverted and contemplative a trait that works to your advantage in mass psychosis. Look at some facts: a virus with no natural mutating background, a complex "vaccine" must be made in a few months. A Spike protein, a misfolding protein, a prion what causes Creutzfeldt-Jakob is in a "vaccine."
The "gain of function" policy was not allowed to be implemented in the USA during Obama. American scientists left for China and Ukraine. Global measures that have no scientific basis. Come on! ?
Having witnessed the clarity of Malone, Desmet, and their critics, the Breggin attacks reminded me of the attacks against Peter Duesberg, Andrew Wakefield, and Celia Farber.
David Lewis Ph.D. wrote the definitive examination of the Wakefield case... http://omsj.org/reports/Lewis%202012.pdf
... and their attacks on Celia Farber were classic. After Harper's published Celia Farber's explosive report about the NIH murder of Joyce Hafford...
https://www.omsj.org/reports/HarpersOutofControl2006.pdf
... the usual suspects contrived "56 errors" to attack Farber, Harpers, and anyone else who dared to legitimize her heretical two-year, heavily fact-checked report.
The attack signatories were all Fauci HIV grantees.
https://aidstruth.org/sites/aidstruth.org/files/documents/ErrorsInFarberArticle.pdf
Their absurd attack and names were enough for effortless skepticism, which was enough for the propagandists.
So when I read the Breggin report, I recognized the style. No serious person would go out of their way to write what they claim to have written.
I've grilled plenty of docs under oath and was not impressed with more than a few - especially "virologists" who rely on divining rods like flow cytometry and PCR testing (PCR is real, PCR tests are not) instead of Koch's Postulates or electron microscopy.
I'm skeptical of them ALL, but Dr. Malone and his peers have broken their silence and raised legitimate questions that must be heard as part of their moral obligation to "informed consent". Their modest exposure of that ongoing, trillion-dollar-pseudoscientific-theocratic money-laundering operation (that they all played a part of) understandably challenges the lives, careers, and credibility of thousands of bent pseudo-scientists and universities - the churches, temples, clerics, theologians, apostles, disciples, and mullahs who, if faced with their day of reckoning in this world would not be reputable enough to drive cabs or dig ditches (without watchful direct supervision).
So yeah, Breggin's attacks serve its purpose because the majority of the global population is too afflicted by life and characteristics described by Asch, Milgram, Desmet and others - people who are too addled, stressed, and distracted to study the arguments from one side or another. In that cacophony, the noisiest mob wins. Like Duesberg, Wakefield and Farber, casual observers will hear that Malone and Desmet were "discredited", shrug their shoulders and think to themselves, "well, who really knows?"
Mission accomplished!